|

THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT:
What They Didn't Want You To Know
One of the A & E Channel's investigative TV programs has now
found the tables turned on it in the most ironic fashion. "The Unexplained," a
Sightings/Unsolved Mysteries" knock-off that deals with the paranormal and
mysterious, has been the focus of an investigation led by one of its past
experts. The findings of this investigation, conducted by a real life "Fox
Mulder," firmly place "The Unexplained's" episode, "Strange Disappearances" in
the same context as the Hitler Diaries and CNN's recent news debacle on nerve
gassing Viet Nam deserters. Like the CNN Viet Nam story, the episode dealt with
a military operation. A test in W.W.II that would have been the latest
development in a long history of military camouflage. Total optical and radar
invisibility. The Philadelphia Experiment.
"...men caught fire, went mad, and - the most bizarre of all, some were
embedded halfway into the deck of the ship. Others phased in and out of this
reality..."
Much has been written and speculated about this legend of an experiment in
"electronic camouflage," both pro and con. Reportedly it ended with the ship
teleporting from Philadelphia to Norfolk with some crew members becoming
embedded in the ship. Sorting the facts from the fiction has proven an almost
impossible task, particularly with the recent flux of misinformation and
deliberate disinformation that has been injected into the internet by those
connected to the U.S. intelligence community, professional skeptics and arm
chair researchers.
Against this confusing tapestry there have been a few constants. They are
that one, Carlos Miguel Allende, claimed in the 1950s to have been a witness to
a test at sea of a ship being made optically invisible using strong
electromagnetic force fields when he was a sailor onboard the merchant marine
vessel SS Furuseth in 1943. He also claimed that during another test that went
wrong, some of the men caught fire, went mad, and - the most bizarre of all,
some were embedded halfway into the deck of the ship. Others phased in and out
of this reality, only kept here by the laying on of hands. Allende wrote a
series of strange letters in 1955 to Morris K. Jessup, a researcher who had
written the book "The Case For The UFO." It was Allende's fear that the same
technology that was responsible for the disasters of the Philadelphia Experiment
was the secret behind the propulsion method used successfully by UFOs. Jessup
had called for research into such force fields of UFOs without having any
knowledge of the navy experiment, and this alarmed Allende.

Official Navy photograph of the US Eldridge during ceremonies for its
commission. The Eldridge was the ship used in the controversial experiment in 1943.
Allende's letters were filled with cryptic references and mailed from an assortment of
locales around America. They can be read on-line at
click here for_more_info.
Jessup eventually dismissed Allende as a crank until in 1957 he was contacted by Capt.
Sidney Sherby and Comdr. George Hoover, two officers from the Office of Naval Research.
They had received a copy of Jessup's book with strange annotations in the margins about a
vanishing ship, aliens and other anomalies. The officers from ONR asked Jessup to travel
to Washington D.C. to meet with them and discuss what the annotations might mean. When
Jessup got there he was surprised to see that the annotations appeared to be from Allende
although they had been written in three different colored inks as though three separate
individuals had been writing comments.
Jessup had no idea what to make of it and was a little unsettled by the interest that
these ONR officers had in the writing, especially about the ship that was made invisible
and it's crew severely injured. The officers even paid Varo Inc. to reprint copies of the
annotated version of Jessup's book and had them passed around ONR for consideration.
Jessup confided in his friend Ivan Sanderson that he felt the officers might want to try
the experiment again. Meanwhile Jessup's life began to be plagued by what he called
"strange coincidences." He began to complain about his health. and his research
efforts took a turn for the worse. In 1959 he was found dead in his car from carbon
monoxide poisoning and declared a suicide without the benefit of an autopsy. Many believe
to this day that he was actually murdered, with Allende left roaming the country to escape
the same fate.
The Office of Naval Research has created a number of form "response" letters
over the years to handle public inquiries into the Philadelphia Experiment. The latest
version can be found at
www.onr.navy.mil/foia/PhillyExp.htm.
Somewhat embarrassed by all the attention drawn to them by the activities of the now long
gone officers, and having not been in existence at the time of the experiment, the ONR has
had to handle the lion's share of public requests for clarification and information. Until
1996 they had no trouble shrugging off accusations of cover-up with simple explanations
about degaussing and misunderstandings about the word "invisible." They contend
that the legend got started based on the routine task of demagnetizing or
"degaussing" the ships so as to be "invisible" to magnetic mines and
torpedoes. Echoing this position on "The Unexplained," as an official
representative of the US. Navy, was US. naval historian John Reilly. Reilly stated that,
as far as he knew, the navy never experimented with making ships invisible with magnetic
fields. The navy has been long indirectly assisted in these apologetic efforts by the
usual gaggle of disinforments.
"The Unexplained" featured an interview with researcher
Robert Goerman, saying that he solved the mystery of the Philadelphia Experiment by a
discovery he made about Carlos Allende. A writer from Pennsylvania who penned articles for
pulp UFO magazines in the '70s, Goerman considered himself to be "a player," at
least an also-ran amongst the galaxy of name UFO researchers of the time. When the book, "The
Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility," by William Moore and Charles
Berlitz came out in 1979,

Goerman was motivated to do his own investigation but in a different direction. Instead
of checking into the new information and science that the book mentioned, he latched onto
Allende because of a quirk of fate - his parents were neighbors of the parents of Allende.
Furthermore, Allende's real name was Allen, Carl Meredith Allen. Goerman's daughter used
to visit the Allens and it was just by chance that he discovered that they were in fact
the family of the elusive Philadelphia Experiment "witness."
After agreeing to keep certain information about the family confidential, the Allens
allowed Goerman to review various cards, letters, and other things that Carl had sent to
his family. They described Carl as "a leg puller," and someone who was very
intelligent but lacked the discipline to achieve his full potential. It was clear from the
items that Goerman looked over that Carl would annotate everything. He was even quirkier
and more eccentric than he had ever imagined. Armed with this new information, Goerman was
convinced that he had the truth, especially after having conversations with Carl himself.
Ignoring all other available information, Goerman wrote "Alias: Carlos Allende"
and it was published in "Fate" magazine in 1980, now archived on the internet at
www.parascope.com/en/articles/allende.htm
. But Goerman's article was not well received by others in the UFO community. He has
remained bitter about this, accusing those who ignore or disagree with his analysis as
only being interested in "selling their books." An accusation that Goerman made
on "The Unexplained" and intentionally or not, inferred this as a motive of the
wrong researcher.
"I know the applicable laws, how to operate with law enforcement, do
investigations, have a badge and I.D., weapons, the whole nine yards and all legal. I'm
versed in psy-ops, surveillance, counter-surveillance, stings, non-lethal weapons. I know
how and can intervene in a felony in progress and execute arrest procedures until law
enforcement arrives. I've actually been involved in cases against pedophiles, a rouge
psychic spy, Men In Black related activity, potential terrorism related to Y2K that
threatens national security. No cops or state police have complained so far. I think that
earns me the 'special'." So says Marshall Barnes, Special Civilian Investigator
Marshall Barnes who "The Unexplained" had contacted through his book distributor
because he was described as an expert on the Philadelphia Experiment. Under the pretext of
trying to get to the truth, Mark Caras allegedly got Marshall to agree to appear on the
show and not allow arguments that Marshall had disproved to go unchallenged.
"...the crux of it all came down to the use of an intense electromagnetic field
that would create a mirage effect of invisibility by refracting light..."
Marshall had been in a similar situation in November of 1996 with the Sci-Fi Channel's
version of Sightings, the magazine format show that the Fox network originally created. It
was the first to break ground in the field of reporting the strange and paranormal.
Marshall used an eleven point white paper to successfully pitch the idea of doing a story
on how he could prove that the last paragraph of the ONR information letter was false,
that there was in fact a scientific basis for invisibility known before the letter was
written. Marshall assembled all of the evidence to prove his case along with a physicist
for Sightings' cameras. Six months later, after he and the physicist had been told
separate stories about why the episode hadn't aired yet, Marshall took things into his own
hands and used a bit of his investigator know how to trick his way into talking with one
of the executive producers. She told him the episode had been canceled because there were
no witnesses to verify the Philadelphia Experiment had taken place.
"That was not part of the deal," Marshall recalls. "I never said that I
could prove that it happened, only that the ONR's statement was false about the science
and that's what I did. The story was sold on that basis. It passed muster in a production
meeting where ideas were voted on up or down. Maleka Brown brought it to that meeting and
Ruth Rafiti was the producer it was assigned to. They sent out a director who hired a two
man production crew to shoot all day. The first excuse was they ran out of editing money.
Then they had to wait to see if they would be renewed for the next season. Finally someone
admitted the episode was canceled but wouldn't tell me why. Then I tricked my way in to
getting a phone call to one of the executive producer people who told me it was because
there was no witnesses, which had nothing to do with the idea that Maleka sold at the
meeting. This producer wasn't even in on it until later. It made no sense to kill that
story, except for one thing - I proved I was right, and I did it right in front of their
own cameras with one of my experiments and they were stunned. It was probably too good. It
left no doubts. I had heard that Sightings had been infiltrated by government types after
all the complaints that they got from the Pentagon when they were on Fox. Exposing Area
51, and all that. I had no opinion about that before. Now I'm almost convinced."

Marshall's "experiments" demonstrated that reflected light
from an object could be refracted in such a way to create a mirage. This mirage would
render that object transparent or invisible, a feat based on the statements made by an
anonymous scientist who was given the cover name of "Dr. Rinehart," by William
Moore. Moore interviewed Rinehart who had met Allende but gave the eccentric the false
name of "Franklin Reno," derived from a road sign describing the distance from
Franklin and Reno Pennsylvania. Rinehart claimed to have been one of the men who worked on
some of the calculations for the Philadelphia Experiment and provided detailed scientific
data up to a point. Marshall determined that if this data made no sense, did not 'check
out', then the whole story would lose much credibility. Using the standard scientific
method, Marshall carefully read Rinehart's account and researched each scientific detail.
The crux of it all came down to the use of an intense electromagnetic field that would
create a mirage effect of invisibility by refracting light. This light would be refracted
by the conditions caused in the air by the field that would include dielectric breakdown
of the air, ionization, and even a zeemanzing of the atoms. Not having the equipment to
cause such conditions, Marshall calculated that if he could find a material that would
refract light, he could at least prove whether or not the basis for the Philadelphia
Experiment had any foundation in science. As fate would have it, he did have such a
material - a special plastic called 'diffraction film' - and he discovered, much to his
amazement, that it worked.

(above) Photograph showing the defraction film and its invisibility effect upon a spool
of thread. Notice that the table top and pen are visible through the spool (A). This
simple experiment proved that defraction was a viable and scientifically sound method of
simulating invisibility.
Marshall found other scientific data to corroborate Rinehart's account, including a
photograph from Sandia National Laboratories from the cover of the college text book,
"Physics: Volume 2." The photograph shows a particle accelerator device, that
sits in water, surrounded eerily by the identical greenish-bluish glow said to have
emanated from the Eldridge as the field generators were being turned on. The glow is
described in this case as the result of the same condition that Rinehart mentioned -
dielectric breakdown of the air near the surface of the water. Marshall's scientific
research was good enough that he was invited in 1996 to present his findings in a
scientific colloquium sponsored by the biological and physical sciences department of
Columbus State Community College. This event is mentioned as part of a press release
announcing that it could be proven that the ONR had in fact been involved in a cover-up
since Marshall's findings directly contradicted the official ONR statement in the last
paragraph of the information sheet. It also mentions that Marshall was to present his
research on the Art Bell radio show. A copy of that release can be viewed at
www.iufog.org/updates/. It was
this event, and the discoveries leading up to it, that the Sightings episode was supposed
to have been based on. If Marshall's research and experiments were good enough to be
presented in a colloquium sponsored by a college science department, why weren't they good
enough for a cable TV show increasingly becoming known more for its psychic ghost hunting?
When considered in that light, Marshall's suspicions of governmental interference are
quite understandable.
But this was supposed to be different with "The Unexplained." Segment
producer Mark Caras had bought Marshall's book and liked its focus on hard, documented
evidence, instead of the wild stories and speculation of most of the available material on
the subject. Not only had Caras taken an interest in the story, he also played a minor
role in Barnes' investigation against respected scientist and UFO researcher Jacques
Vallee. Vallee had written an article debunking the Philadelphia Experiment called
"Anatomy of a Hoax." The basis for the article was that Vallee found another
witness to the event, a witness that said that he was there at the time that it was
supposed to have taken place and that it never did. The article had been hailed as the
best research on the subject by UFO pundits like Michael Corbin, whose ParaNet newsgroups
host discussions on such topics on the internet. But Caras knew that Marshall's book
exposed the Vallee article as a fraud since Vallee had not checked Dudgeon's background or
statements - statements that proved to be false when checked against navy documents and
other historical information. Marshall unearthed admissions made by Vallee himself
concerning his being taught on how to write disinformation, as well as Vallee's links to
the shadowy Aviary. The Aviary consists of various former CIA, DIA, INSCOM, and AFOSI
agents and connected scientists. Allegedly dedicated to infiltration, studying and
disinforming the UFO community as double agents, links for this group can be found at such
sites as
www.nacomm.org/news/1996/aviary.htm.
The Society for Scientific Exploration, that issued last year's report calling for a
further study of UFOs, is an Aviary infiltrated organization, as is their Journal of
Scientific Exploration that published both the report and Jacques Vallee's fraudulent
article.
Marshall sent an eight page report to JSE editor Bernhard M. Haisch, informing him of
his investigation against Vallee, the evidence that he had acquired and his intention to
expose Vallee, with the suggestion that Haisch put a disclaimer on the JSE web page for
the article's abstract. When Marshall called Haisch to discuss the matter, Haisch acted as
if Marshall's investigation was inconsequential and flatly refused to inform readers of
his findings. Haisch seemed more concerned about the possibility of Marshall taking his
report to the internet.
"What are you going to do? Put it on the internet?" Haisch asked. Sensing a
point of consternation, Marshall held his cards close to his vest.
"It's not a matter of what I'm going to do," he replied, "It's a matter
of what you should do if you want to live up to these high standards that your publication
brags about on your web site." Haisch hung up.
Caras was intrigued by Marshall's gutsy, 'go get the truth' attitude. When considering
including the Anatomy article in The Unexplained episode, Caras called Bernhard Haisch and
then reported back to Marshall on Haisch's disposition. "You're really on to
something," he allegedly told the investigator. "Haisch was unnerved by your
call, and nervous about my doing an episode about all this." Caras also told Marshall
that after failing to return calls to his office, Jacques Vallee called five minutes after
Caras left him a message that he was going to proceed with the episode featuring
Marshall's statements about him without Vallee's opportunity for rebuttal. During the
ensuing conversation, Vallee said that he was "sorry that he had anything to do with
the Philadelphia Experiment" and worried about his reputation in the UFO and venture
capital communities as a result of Marshall's investigation. He had forwarded Marshall's
report to his attorney, an action that Marshall considered to be in preparation for some
kind of legal attack to keep him silent by tying the issue up in court. Based on this new
information from Caras, Marshall decided to strike against Vallee publicly in a
information warfare styled campaign that would only be held back until Caras decided if he
was actually going to include the Anatomy issue in the episode. If he was, Marshall would
wait until Caras had a chance to get his interview in the can, knowing that once the
campaign began, Vallee would be loathed to talk to anyone.
When the time came for Marshall to be taped for his appearance, he was handed a release
form that seemed to stray away from Marshall and Caras' prior agreement. Recognizing it as
a standard release giving the show the freedom to edit as they pleased, Barnes reminded
Caras about their arrangement which Caras said he would still honor. The shoot that day
included a demonstration of Marshall's experiments for the camera and the photos from
"Physics: Volume 2" and a lengthy interview with Marshall. Jean Claude Ba, a
physics professor was also interviewed. Marshall later sent Caras a copy of his dramatic
experiment showing a sheet of diffraction film causing a full scale replica of the Santa
Maria to look as transparent as a phantom ship.
As the time approached for the episode to air, Caras began to act cryptically. First
was his mention of having a computer animation appear to 'dramatize' the Eldridge becoming
invisible. When Marshall asked about the use of the video of his experiment with the Santa
Maria, Caras acted like it was almost non-existent. "His attitude was like it either
wasn't good enough of a dub or that it didn't show what I said it did. Regardless, it was
a disingenuous response but I chose not to push the issue. I know how producers can be
with their production toys."
The next thing to happen was Caras telling Marshall that the executive producer
Jonathan Towers, had him make 'changes' in the script because it was 'too weird'.
"Don't worry," Caras told Marshall, "you'll still get the truth
across." Marshall was beginning to worry but having been informed by Caras that there
would be no coverage over the Vallee issue because of lack of available time, Marshall had
begun his campaign against Vallee on the internet, the very medium that Haisch had
apprehensively asked about. Through a network of cyber journalists, the story about
Vallee's fraud and Haisch's attempt to keep it secret slowly began to appear in various
forms until now if you do a search on the net combining the words 'fraud', 'hoax' and
'anatomy', depending on the search engine, you'll get articles about Jacques Vallee like
www.ufomind.com/updates/1998/jun/m08-010.shtml.
By August 21 the first wave of Marshall's campaign was over and he was beginning his
middle game. But that night he stopped to see what Mark meant when he said he had to make
some 'script changes'. What he saw was as far from the truth as you could get. In fact,
the Office of Naval Research could have written the script themselves.
"To this day, there are no credible documents or witnesses to support the
Philadelphia Experiment," Bill Curtis said, smiling as he closed the episode.
Marshall was stunned. What he had been led to believe would be a show that would finally
reveal the truth, had been just the opposite. None of his evidence was shown, his
experiments weren't even mentioned - they had shown a cheap computer animation instead
that wasn't even an accurate dramatization. There was no mention of Dr. Rinehart or
Marshall's investigation against the Navy. They portrayed Rinehart's account of how the
experiment was accomplished as a only a theory that Marshall come up with. They had
researcher Andrew Hochheimer making only skeptical comments when his
click here
for_more_info takes one of the closest looks at how it could have happened
and comes up with much the same information that Marshall did.

Cover of physics text book shows dielectric breakdown of the air over water as linked
to the Philadelphia Experiment.
Representing the Navy was naval historian John Reilly, in the role of the apologist,
saying among other things, "I have no knowledge of the Navy ever having tried to make
ships invisible using magnetic fields," as if that were a legitimate statement.
Marshall knew better. So did segment produced Mark Caras. When Marshall wasn't shown
giving his rebuttal to such typical Navy side-stepping he knew that this had gone wrong.
This wasn't what Caras and he had agreed upon. Neither was Goerman's completely
unchallenged litany about his investigation against Carlos Allende. The worse was when
Goerman made the statement about how other researchers had ignored his findings against
Allende because they wanted to sell their books. Then the program cut to Marshall, as if
he were one of these researchers, an editorial act that Marshall refers to as
"defamatory".
"I was in complete shock." he recalls. "I felt lied to and violated.
It's one thing to lie to someone in order to find out the truth, but I was lied to so they
could use me for a straw man. They set me up, gutted my entire argument, took out all my
evidence, and then they lied about what the truth was and presented a completely false
version of the facts. It was the opposite of the slogan, 'the closest you'll ever get to
the truth'. It was the furthest thing from it."
At first Marshall was worried about damage to his reputation. The Vallee campaign was
beginning to cool down. He was worried that his enemies may have seen the program and try
to use it against him. Friends on the net assured him that all seemed to be quiet. It
turns out that, along with being merely a knock off of "Sightings," "The
Unexplained" isn't watched much by the professional research crowd and their
associates.
"I was in complete shock... I felt lied to and violated."
Marshall had heard that Bud Hopkins, the abduction researcher, had received similar
treatment from the TV show "Nova" and decided that he wasn't going to just cry
foul. Marshall had a weapon, the faxed questions for the program on the Towers Productions
letter head. He would use his contacts and skills as a video producer to create a program
that would set the record straight by producing a 60 minute rebuttal that would reveal the
truth. He would show how "The Unexplained" didn't by showing him answering all
the questions that he had originally been asked. Then he got word that he should check
http://www.aetv.com
(scroll down to where it says "Unexplained" and click on 'comments'.) On the
second page, under "Strange Disappearances," Robert Goerman had posted a message
proclaiming (in all caps) that the show had taken "the high road" and that the
story of the "experiment" had cost too much of the researchers time and
resources. That was the last straw.
"I think up to that point Marshall was just wanting the information that had been
missing to come out," a friend remarked. "But the Goerman thing was it. It was
rubbing salt in the wounds and from that moment on, it was war. Marshall was after all of
them and he wasn't going to stop until he had enough to discredit Goerman, Reilly, and
Towers Productions for setting him up in the first place - 'scorched earth' scenario all
the way."
Indeed, the rebuttal program became a full fledged intelligence operation. It was as if
"The Unexplained" hadn't taken him seriously - not as a researcher, and
certainly not as an investigator. So Marshall was going to do what an investigator would
do - get the evidence and nail them to the wall. Goerman had made the same remarks on the
message board for "Quest For The Truth," a Philadelphia Experiment site with a
fair but skeptical tone. It's web master, Mack Shelton, had posted a veiled reference to
Marshall's appearance on the program, commenting about "people who get on TV making
claims without any evidence..." But Marshall figured that was expected, since that's
exactly what Caras had shown. But when Marshall realized, at the same time, that Shelton
had boldly and falsely claimed in the text of his site that Moore's 'Dr. Rinehart' was an
exact word for word copy of the character in the sci-fi book, "Thin Air,"
Marshall decided it was time to take out all the major detractors, along with "The
Unexplained."
The first step was to set a strategy. He already had the questions. What he needed was
definitive proof that Goerman had formulated his hoax theory while ignoring evidence that
was in his possession. That would be the William Moore book. To do that he would have to
get Goerman to talk. No problem. A basic 'sting-op' procedure. He also wanted to do the
same to the Navy's John Reilly, because he needed definitive evidence that nothing the
Navy would say about the Philadelphia Experiment would be the truth. After all, if the
Philadelphia Experiment did happen, it would still be top secret. They would have
to deny it the same way as the Air Force denies the existence of Area 51. In particular,
Marshall wanted to prove Reilly's comment of "having no knowledge of such a
test," was irrelevant.
"I was shocked when he said he had never heard of Area 51...He swore up and down
that he had never heard of it and didn't know what it was."
Then there was the Towers Productions and Mark Caras. Caras had warned Marshall that
changes would be made in the show, but Marshall didn't trust Caras anymore. When Caras
acted as if there was something wrong with the video of his experiment, it didn't make
sense. Marshall never forgot it. Now it seemed that it could be a clue that Caras may have
been more involved in what happened than he revealed. Jonathon Towers and Caras would have
to be dealt with as well, but Marshall decided to go after Reilly first.
Contacting a cyber journalist friend for back-up, Marshall called Reilly, posing as a
reporter, and got his permission to tape the call. The strategy was simple and it worked
like a charm. "I buttered him up first," Marshall explained, "telling him
that I saw him on "The Unexplained" and was working on a follow-up story. Then I
just let him run his mouth, walked him down the garden path 'til I got him where I
wanted..." Where Marshall wanted him was the same place that the old TV attorneys got
their hostile witnesses under cross examination. The so-called "Perry Mason"
moment when the witness is caught in the obvious lie or subterfuge. Marshall discovered a
few unexpected gems in the process.
"I was shocked when he said he had never heard of Area 51," Marshall said.
"He swore up and down that he had never heard of it and didn't know what it
was." Marshall had brought up the infamous secret base in the Nevada desert as an
example of military denial of top secret information that is still known in the public
domain. "So I'm thrown off guard by this because I'm thinking 'he's just doing what
the policy dictates' and he was protesting his ignorance so much that I didn't want to get
sidetracked. So I asked him what his clearance level was and he said it was Secret. Then I
said, "So that means that if something is Top Secret, then you can't know about it,
correct?" He said, "Yes." So I knew I had him, but I went in for the
kill."
Marshall then followed up by asking Reilly point blank if his Secret clearance also
meant that if something was Top Secret from W.W.II, and was still Top Secret today, that
he also would not be cleared to know about it. "Yes, I suppose you're right."
Victorious, Marshall thanked him for his time, leaving Reilly somewhat puzzled and
apprehensive sounding. He should have been. Marshall had just got him on tape
disqualifying his statement on "The Unexplained." But Marshall wasn't done with
him yet.
Next on the list was Goerman. The same method was used and yielding equally surprising
results. Goerman was cocky, saying, "You know I used to be a player,..."
describing how he had been a UFO pulp magazine writer in the 70's and ran with high
profile researchers, dropping out after his work exposing Allende failed to get him the
kudos he felt that it deserved. Marshall didn't care. He asked Goerman if he had written
his article exposing Allende before or after he read the William Moore book. Goerman said
that it was after he read the Moore book because it was the Moore book that caused him to
write the article.
"So you do remember Dr. Rinehart?" Marshall asked. "Yes, I remember a
character named 'Dr. Rinehart'," Goerman responded, sounding rather surprised by the
question. Marshall ignored the obvious reference to the idea that Rinehart was just made
up by Moore. When asked if he had checked out the information about Rinehart, Goerman said
'no'. Marshall pressed on, quizzing the 'player' about his lack of inquiry into the claims
of the scientist. He listened as Goerman buried himself deeper and deeper. Goerman made it
clear that he felt that Allende had made the whole thing up and so felt no need to do any
further investigation. In other words, Goerman hadn't done any real investigation
because he hadn't checked out all the available information. "If Allende made it all
up, I don't see what Rinehart has to do with any of it," he stupidly insisted,
oblivious to the fact that, if Rinehart's statements were found to be accurate, then
Allende didn't make the whole thing up - or at least not all of it.
Slowly but surely, Marshall's contention that "The Unexplained" allowed
irrelevant testimony to stand unchallenged was being proven. But he wasn't done yet.
Marshall wanted all the evidence he could possibly get. He had the oversized envelope
that Caras had used to mail back the 3/4" video tape of his experiment which
succeeded in making a full scale replica of the Santa Maria look like a transparent
mirage. He filmed a segment for his documentary showing this tape being pulled from the
envelope, going directly into a playback machine and then showing the experiment saying,
"this is what they didn't want you to see." This wasn't enough though. He had a
reference in the questions about his experiments but he wanted definitive proof that Caras
knew the experiments dealt with invisibility effects and then didn't show them.
Remembering Caras had bought some of the diffraction material, Marshall called up the
company and was able to get a copy of Caras' invoice, showing that Towers Productions had
paid some $20 for an 18" by 18" piece of diffraction material plus $10 for the
Fed Ex shipping costs. This proved conclusively that Caras had important evidence in his
possession and had suppressed it.

Photograph showing the diffraction film and its invisibility effect upon a ship.
The Philadelphia Experiment caused a similar effect with electromagnetic fields. This was
suppressed from Marshall's report on "The Unexplained."
Showing the computer animation was a diversion and it was insulting for Caras to think
that Marshall didn't know it. The plan was obvious - kill any mention of Rinehart as a
witness; present his account of the physics as an idea that Marshall had come up with;
don't show or mention anything about his experiments because, if people saw them, they
would look like more than just a "theory." Then, having established it as just a
"theory," they would introduce Goerman and Reilly to discredit the only witness
left, Allende. Then they would dismiss the whole thing as a hoax. Finally, edit Goerman's
complaint to reflect badly on Marshall. Now Marshall was turning the tables on them, and
he wasn't done yet.
"Caras told me that Jonathon Towers had told him to change the script,"
Marshall recalls, "but I didn't have it on tape. I needed the evidence." So
Marshall got a voice mail number and called Caras up at a time when he felt he wouldn't be
home. "Hi Mark. It's Marshall Barnes. Gee, you weren't kidding when you said Jonathon
Towers had you change the script. What was the point of having me on in the first place?
Call me..." The call was a ruse to get Caras to respond to the comment about Towers.
Having Caras call the voice mail would be a legal way of obtaining Caras' response on
tape. Caras called and didn't respond to the comment but just said that he had been away.
He asked Marshall to call him back.
Marshall did call Caras back, providing a "beep" in the background which
signified that he was taping the conversation. Marshall repeated the accusation about
Towers. "Yeah I ,I infer that you weren't happy with it or something."
"What can I say. It didn't tell the truth." "You know, you know,"
Caras stumbled, "I think we did the best we could, given the information that
existed." Marshall was stunned. Caras was giving him a completely different story. It
was clear that he didn't care anymore about the truth than the Navy did. Marshall almost
felt like asking if Towers was controlled by the intelligence community, but he didn't
bother. He didn't care anymore. He knew the truth was finally going to get out - because
he was going to do it himself. Marshall would make sure that the credibility of "The
Unexplained" was exposed in the process. Their conversation began to get heated as
Caras started trying to deny the validity of Marshall's evidence - the same evidence that
he had raved and formatted questions about before. The phone went dead. But Marshall had
all he needed.
Next, Marshall decided to go back after Reilly. He wanted to confront Reilly directly
about his previous comments, cross-examination style. Reintroducing himself as 'Mr.
Barnes' and checking up on some points from the previous reporter's questions, Marshall
launched into Reilly by getting him to confirm his clearance status and it's limitations.
He asked Reilly about Yehudi, the Navy's (1943) formerly secret project to make an
anti-submarine plane invisible with special lights. Reilly acknowledged that he was
familiar with it. When asked if Reilly knew about it before it was declassified, Reilly
said "No, because I had no occasion to." Then Marshall asked him about his
denials of knowing anything about Area 51.
"It appears that when it comes to the truth, if it is 'out there,' ... A&E,
Towers Productions and 'The Unexplained' are the furthest from it that you could ever
get!"
"I haven't the slightest idea what Area 51 is," Reilly insisted. Marshall
pressed him. "Everyone has probably heard of Area 51..." Reilly responded,
"I'm not a nuclear test buff, do you see what I mean?" Marshall actually
wouldn't until later. He was going in for the kill on the issue of Reilly's clearance
level and disclosure of classified information. "My question is then... if the
Philadelphia Experiment took place that means that you wouldn't be allowed to know about
it anyway right?"
"Oh yeah, but I think that's getting far fetched frankly."
"My point is that, if it did take place, you wouldn't be allowed to know about it
anyway, right?"
"If such a thing happened and if it were still classified..."
"That still means you wouldn't be allowed to know about it."
"Yeah."
"My point is this: you were on a TV show acting as if you were an expert on
something. But if it had existed, and were still classified, you wouldn't be able to know
about it anyway."
"Yeah." Reilly was feeling the pressure.
"That kind of negates your authority on the subject because you wouldn't be in a
position to know..."
Reilly began to get angry but it was too late. Marshall was putting the squeeze on.
"You and I can hypothesize until the.."
"Well I'm done hypothesizing. Isn't correct that if something is Top Secret, let's
say that you have knowledge of it, you wouldn't be able to divulge that information
anyway. Isn't that correct?"
"I would, I would not be able to divulge any kind of classified information, it
doesn't have to be Top Secret."
"Right. So let's say that something like that happened and you did know about it,
you wouldn't able, in fact ,nor would anyone else in the Navy, be in a position to reveal
that information anyway, isn't that correct?"
"And little green men from outer space...", Reilly began snapping back before
Marshall shut him down.
"I'm not talking about little green men from outer space, I'm talking about the
policy for Top Secret information and how it is handled."
"Yeah."
"So it's true that if something is Top Secret that the military, whether it's the
Navy or anyone else, cannot discuss or divulge that information. They would have to say it
didn't exist or 'no, it didn't happen'."
"No, you don't say that, you simply say 'no I cannot discuss that'."
Marshall wasn't buying that.
"But I would point out to you, sir, that the Air Force's position on Area 51 is
that it doesn't exist, even though everyone knows it exists. Their official position is
that it doesn't exist. It's not that they can't talk about it. So if something like
this did happen, the Navy wouldn't be admitting it anyway."
"No," Reilly relented, "they wouldn't be talking about it. Yeah"
"Right. So that means that your testimony or anyone else's from the Navy is
inconsequential."
"Why of course!... But you're piling one thing on top of another and
another."
Marshall had what he wanted and so went for the 'cool down', disengaging from the
argument and, in the process, reassuring Reilly that he believed that Reilly hadn't heard
of Area 51.
"I'm not a nuclear test buff so..." Reilly repeated as if it was a rehearsed
response.
"Have you heard of Groom Lake before or Dreamland?"
"No. Those things have no particular interest to me."
Later, when Marshall was checking the recording he realized that he hadn't mention that
Area 51 was connected to the Nevada nuclear test range at all. So if he hadn't mentioned
it, and if Reilly wasn't lying, then why would he think he had to be a "nuclear test
buff" to have knowledge of the secret base in the Nevada desert?
Marshall is now putting the finishing touches on what has become a feature length
documentary with the title, "The Philadelphia Experiment: What The Unexplained Didn't
Want 'X'-plained." The truth that Mark Caras and Towers Productions didn't want you
to know is revealed in its entirety. Mack Shelton is exposed as a researcher
"wannabe" and Vallee, Bernhard Haisch, and other disinformers get their due.
Although this has given Marshall the opportunity to prove that he is one of the best
investigators on the real X-File scene, he could have saved himself a lot of trouble if he
had done an investigative search for Towers Productions on the internet, before agreeing
to appear on their show. At
www.realscreen.com
under "Towers leanings: from law to depression," it says,(in the last sentence
of the second paragraph) "The Unexplained seeks to debunk claims of the
supernatural and paranormal."
Regardless, it's ironic that, at the same site on
www.realscreen.com (in the 15th
paragraph of the article "Investigating Bill Kurtis") the host of "The
Unexplained" says, "I spent a lot of time in local television... It's eroded to
the point where I don't think anybody observes any ethical standards anymore."
And so it's not surprising that if you go to http://store.aetv.com enter
'disappearances' as a search, then click on that title on the next page, you will be
confronted with a page selling the home video of "The Unexplained" episode in
question. However, a quick review of it's description will reveal an account far more
fantastic than any yarn spun by Carlos Allende or Mark Caras. In the second paragraph it
begins "Another, even more incredible case involves a top-secret Navy experiment
allegedly witnessed by a self-styled paranormal philosopher, who is interviewed here. The
man claims to have watched from another ship as a Navy vessel and crew
disappeared..." Obvious false advertising not withstanding, it appears that when it
comes to the truth, if it is "out there," in this case A&E, Towers
Productions and "The Unexplained" are the furthest from it that you could ever
get!
|